What we call "anarchy" here should not be confused with traditional anarchism. The prolonged crisis affecting Western politics compels us to question the entire tradition of critical-philosophical thought, including the terms, categories, and foundations of democracy.

Andityas Matos radically criticizes the inadequacy of the vocabulary of current political practices, launching an innovative proposal for considering other potentialities based on the experience of "anarchy."

Here is a dictionary of radical politics that seeks to understand the nature of the experience of power, which is not something natural, but historical; which is not necessarily identified with the ideas of hierarchy, command, and separation; which does not develop linearly or progressively, but largely by chance. This does not mean, however, that this experience is not driven by certain very powerful interests, which must be unmasked, criticized, and overcome.

"A new reflection on politics that moves away from exhausted semantics and focuses on a new way of understanding its relationship with philosophy." - Roberto Esposito