
Through a Marxist analysis of Bitcoin, Edemilson Paraná offers a precise definition of the cryptocurrency, which itself contains the explanation for many of its limitations: Bitcoin does not represent the overcoming of politics in terms of monetary administration because, precisely due to the characteristics touted as driving this overcoming, it fails to fulfill its intended purpose. Instead of replacing global currency, it has a low volume and limited circulation; instead of producing monetary stability, it is highly unstable due to its role as a speculative asset; and finally, instead of guaranteeing decentralized governance, the concentration of relative power among its users only increases.
The critique of the cryptocurrency's limitations and the belief in purely technical-scientific solutions to the problems of capitalism does not imply a technophobic or conservative persp...read more






