We are almost 100 years away from the first attempts to interweave psychoanalysis and Marxism. Over the course of almost a century, a series of authors produced ideas that today were abandoned as they were considered unsuccessful Faced with this situation, years ago I began to wonder why these authors have become practically unknown. His works are not taught and even less are they discussed in the field of psychoanalysis or Marxism. Why recover today these attempts to cross between psychoanalysis and Marxism? We find ourselves in postmodern times with structuralist and poststructuralist versions of psychoanalysis and Marxism, where certain negative elements such as bad cholesterol, which signify the historical subject, humanism, social transformation and revolution, were purged. It would seem that we are effects of ahistorical structures that transcend us. The hegemonic and postmodern version of psychoanalysis has transformed it into a worldview. He maintains that, ultimately, all our subjectivity depends on a structure of unconscious desire Rescuing these crosses between psychoanalysis and Marxism allows us to rescue the possibility of the emancipatory struggle, in addition to sustaining the complexity of our own subjectivity.